Thoughts on Immigration

Find Prometheus on Facebook Support Prometheus

Thoughts on Immigration

By Joe Holmes



As the presidential primaries draw near, one of the most contentious topics being debated by the candidates is immigration. Many Republican candidates seem to support building a wall between the United States and our neighbor to the South and rounding up the current illegal immigrants and sending them back to Mexico. Others, such as Senator McCain, have argued that America is the land of opportunity and that building barriers and fences undermines the pursuit of the American dream. Democrats are similarly mixed. Many democrats would provide illegal immigrants currently in the country citizenship while closing the border to future immigrants. While the prescriptions differ, it is clear that both parties are struggling with this touchy subject.

Built into this national debate are some fundamental assumptions that I believe are in desperate need of reevaluation. First, people assume immigrants will overwhelmingly be a drain on our economy based on their statistically low incomes and low tax contributions. While this seems like our starting place, the problem is really much deeper – below this assumption is another, more fundamental assumption – that the government can/should/must continue to provide the same level of government services it currently does. It is undeniable that our social welfare system (Medicare, Medicaid, social security, welfare, and unemployment) cannot absorb the hit of millions of lowincome immigrants. As a result, many conclude that we must ban mass immigration from poorer countries and cherry pick who we actually let into our country. However, this approach is short-sided and would likely harm the national economy.

Immigrants perform valuable services and jobs in our country that many Americans simply would not perform. By and large immigrants come to the United States precisely because they feel like they can make it in our country. If there were no jobs and opportunity in this country, why would an individual choose to displace his or her self? The immediate response may be because our country has a more refined welfare system and because we take care of our citizens. However, if our bloated and inefficient welfare system were drastically reduced in size, this incentive would hardly seem to carry much weight. Further, the millions of illegal immigrants currently living in our country do not have access to government assistance programs.

Thus, the argument that government benefits play a decisive role in people"s decision to illegally immigrate to the United States is largely unfounded. Moreover, when you couple this fact with my underlying assumption – that social welfare programs can and should be limited – government assistance has little bearing on an individual or family"s decision to immigrate. From the mid 19th century to the early 20th century, the western world experienced a huge movement of people across national borders. It was during this time that many Europeans immigrated to our country. Economists would say that during this time Europe was capital poor and labor rich and that the United States was capital rich and labor poor. Rather than move capital and business, a somewhat more difficult task (especially when the capital is land or manufacturing factories), people were able to move across borders to countries where their labor was in higher demand. From this balancing of capital and labor came a period of tremendous growth and prosperity. Yet in the 1920"s, a wave of xenophobia (not unlike the one currently being experienced in our country) swept across the country and immigration was largely limited and heavily regulated. With the depression, immigration became a low priority; as a result, movement across borders was severely limited during this time. It is only in the past 20 years or so that immigration has once again become an issue of national debate.

Free marketers push hard for the free flow of capital across national borders. This signals that more than a hundred years after the United States" immigration boom the nation is still largely capital rich and labor poor. Free trade and, correspondingly, free movement of capital are essential components to continued global and national economic growth. Yet many overlook the significance of the free movement of people. I understand that it is somewhat difficult to perceive the virtues of immigration when one focuses on the unsustainability of continued government spending and the expectation of absorbing many millions of low income earners. However, a number of leading economists and government analysts have already asserted that many government programs such as social security and Medicare are not economically feasible based on future income tax projections. Furthermore, an incalculable portion of our national economy and service industries are dependent upon the cheap labor provided by immigrants. As a result, giving all immigrants the boot or building a mile-high wall across the border can only harm America.

The fundamental problem in the immigration debate is not the unsustainability of having to absorb millions of immigrants (we have done this in the past) the problem lies in the unsustainability of our current welfare state. The immigration question sheds light on a fact that might otherwise be able to be ignored for a limited amount of time – that our government provides too many services and provides these services in a largely inefficient manner. From this it necessarily follows that our only two viable options are closed borders and continued government spending or open borders and reduced spending. For reasons articulated above, the former solution is unsustainable; we simply cannot maintain our current consumption habits and lifestyle while closing the border. The free movement of people is the only workable solution to the immigration debate; however, its success is predicated on the government providing fewer services and programs. Ultimately, this issue – the unsustainability of our current welfare system – is one that will have to be dealt with sometime in the future. The immigration debate brings this fact front and center and will hopefully lead to a reduction in the government"s provision of services.

Trackback(0)
Comments (5)add comment

Walker said:

0
...
Absolutely
http://www.monstershopnow.com/...s a wide
Monster Beats by Dr. Dre solo High Performance On-Ear Headphones White variety of diapers and each of choices sturdy, simple make use of and flow free. Additionally enter play several colors, patterns in addition to sizes which enables it to be adjusted to have a perfectly close and flow free healthy whenever. This Super Brite, Tremendous Whisper Put, Whisper Pant, Original in addition to Super Snap are normally top advertising and reputable diaper protects. They can be employed with this Bummis prefolds in addition to Bamboozles or together with other brands connected with flats, prefolds, contours and built in diapers. You may even go in addition to visit the gorgeous drenched bags which come inside of any cool number of colors in addition to patterns and as well tote carriers, liners in addition to training shorts. Mother-easeMother-ease possesses designed various superb in addition to unique covers which might be simple position and press, leak cost-free, perfectly changeable and rather darned lovely! You could possibly buy quite a few cool patterned themes as well as Rainforest, Wetlands, Ocean in addition to Safari. Also you can get various soft colors from which to pick out including lilac, yellow in addition to white. Each main handle designs by means of Mother-ease usually are classified seeing that Airflow in addition to Rikki Put. The move of air was developed with snaps and is particularly designed permitting airflow about the skin, the diaper then the handle which puts a stop to skin rashes in addition to sensitivities. The Rikki is usually constucted by Velcro for virtually every adjustable, safeguarded, snug in addition to slim healthy. KissaluvsKissaluvs offers just about the most coveted protects available. Their wool covers are intended with very soft healthy Australian wool but will at some sort of glance repel water. It generally is a leak cost-free, super at ease and penetrates in several sizes
Beats by Dr. Dre as well as small, choice and substantial. In addition on their usability, wool protects were created with natural fibers that is certainly actually anti-bacterial in addition to breathable allowing for a good amount of airflow into your skin. But if your main little one endures very sensitive skin or maybe nappy rash then wool is usually an ideal resolution to defend skin. Wool is usually incredibly absorbent which often commonly keep leaks in spite of the presence of the most extremely heavy connected with wetters. Wool makes a beneficial nighttime alternative for major wetters. The absolute best cloth diaper protects for 2011 usually are fashioned by means of Bummis, Kissaluvs in Beats by dre addition to Mother-ease. When thinking of expending hard earned money on little one products just one must research to think about the greatest volume of product
Monster Beats by Dr. Dre butterfly High Performance In-Ear Headphones reviews as humanly possible. This way when you make your responsibility you usually are confident that you've chosen the absolute best product in your case and unfortunately childbirth. More methods for textile diapers in addition to cloth diaper covers be put into your Healthy Baby. Your Healthy Baby can be your premier textile diapering learning resource and on-line store providing a full cloth diapering FAQ article series and as well ranked and number one cloth diapers in addition to diapering merchandise. Report this post
 
November 23, 2011 | url
Votes: +0

Coach Outlet Online said:

April 20, 2012 | url
Votes: +0

louis vuitton handbags said:

0
...
Focus on your blessings, not your troubles Welcome to online store. http://www.louis-vuitton-handbags.net/
 
May 22, 2012 | url
Votes: +0

Belstaff Jackets said:

0
...
Most of the shock value of Belstaff Jackets releasing a bag with a four-figure price tag wore off years ago, but the disparity between the prices of the Belstaff Jackets Outlet Madison Calf Hair Brynne Satchel and the Belstaff Jackets Madison Ocelot Sabrina Satchel truly caught be off guard.
The Brynne, left, is made of printed calf hair with leather trim and is 14 inches wide. Belstaff Leather Jacket has many, many loyal fans who love the brand’s bags (not to mention the many other products it now offers), and I can’t help but think that those enthusiastic Belstaff Jackets UK customers have to be the primary audience for such an expensive bag. For $1400, I’m running straight to Balenciaga. Then again, that’s favorite brand, so I can understand the why Belstaff Men Jackets fans feel the way they do about their label. For that amount of money, though, I’d suggest they buy the Sabrina (which would even be useful in the rain!) and save the other $1100 for two or more future Belstaff Jackets purchases.
 
November 07, 2012 | url
Votes: +0

Belstaff Jackets said:

0
...
There was a time when huge celebrities who largely avoided domestic advertising in order to maintain their pristine images for Belstaff Down Jackets fans did ad campaigns overseas for big bucks and Americans were none the wiser.Michael Kors Outlet, we now have a peek at Gwyneth Paltrow‘s first ads as the international brand ambassador for Belstaff Jackets UK.American consumers already have a vision of Coach and a vision of Gwyneth Paltrow, and those two vision don’t necessarily intersect. And that’s fine, because Belstaff Jackets is already raking in bushels of money on its current, carefully crafted American branding.But for an overseas audience that’s less familiar with the position that Beats By Dre Norge has in the American fashion landscape, the fresh-faced, blonde, blue-eyed actress against a blurry, fast-paced Manhattan backdrop likely reflects exactly the combination of urbanity and Americanness that Coach Outlet would like its foreign customers to see when they look at one of the brand’s handbags. She certainly does look happy with her patent leather satchel.
 
November 07, 2012 | url
Votes: +0

Write comment
smaller | bigger

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy